Recent News
-
WPT: Froelich Finishes First on Indiana Day 1
March 21, 2010 2:16 am -
ESPN’s November Nine Coverage Wins Another Sports Emmy Nomination
March 20, 2010 1:31 pm -
Sit-N-Go: Dan O’Brien
March 19, 2010 5:39 pm -
Online Poker: Theczar19 Still Reigns Supreme in Rankings
March 19, 2010 1:14 pm -
Pros Turn to Twitter to Rack Up WSOP TOC Votes
March 18, 2010 6:18 pm -
Online Poker: Steve gboro780 Gross Joins Brunson 10
March 18, 2010 4:25 pm -
KY Supreme Court Rules in Favor of State in Domain Name Case
March 18, 2010 3:24 pm -
Another Arrest and New Evidence in the EPT Berlin Case
March 18, 2010 12:13 am -
POY: Karr Zooms into the Top Ten, Marchese Closing In
March 17, 2010 6:06 pm -
One Suspect From EPT Berlin Robbery Turns Himself In
March 17, 2010 12:20 pm
Search News
South Carolina Men Appeal February Guilty Verdict in Circuit Court
- Jennifer Newell | August 7, 2009
Six months ago, the unexpected verdict came down. After the five men were tried in a Mount Pleasant, South Carolina court for holding a poker game but breaking a law from 1802, Judge J. Lawrence Duffy agreed with the premise of the defense attorney’s argument that poker was a game of skill. But since the law made it illegal to play “any game with cards or dice,” the decision was a reluctant but distinct guilty verdict. An appeal was promised.
By August of 2009, the defendants were in the midst of their appeal. Robert Chimento, Jeremy Bristel, Michael Williamson, Scott Richards, and John Willis began their journey through the South Carolina court system when they gathered in April of 2006 for a home poker game and experienced a police raid. Instead of accepting the issuance of fines, the five men chose to fight the outdated and unreasonable law in court, a battle that came to a head in February of 2009 with the aforementioned guilty verdict. With defense attorney Jeff Phillips and the Poker Players Alliance legal team in complete support of their cause, and the judge admitting that poker was not a game of skill but lacked any precedent to be distinguished from gambling, the appeal process began immediately.
In circuit court on August 5, Phillips again challenged the 1802 law. Under the argument that the law defines a “house of gambling” loosely, Phillips went after the law. “If an essential element of a crime is not defined, then how could a person know if they are violating it or not?” he asked after the hearing. The state attorney general’s argument that the loosely interpreted law puts poker in a games-of-chance category and therefore constitutes the game as gambling and illegal, actually fed into Phillips’ case better than expected, as the lower court judge clearly stated that poker was a game of skill.
With all eyes on the case in the hopes of overturning an antiquated law that does not apply to modern day society, arguments have been made and Circuit Court Judge Markley Dennis is set to render a ruling on the appeal in the coming weeks.
Related posts:
- South Carolina Finds Poker a Skill Game but Defendants Guilty The decision was handed down today in a South Carolina...
- UIGEA Upheld by 3rd Circuit Court in iMEGA Appeal After a two-year court battle, the Interactive Media Entertainment &...
- Sexton to Testify at South Carolina Poker Trial Today [caption id="attachment_2262" align="alignleft" width="200" caption="Mike Sexton (photo courtesy World...
- Pennsylvania Skill Game Ruling Appealed to State Superior Court Weeks after a criminal court in Pennsylvania ruled on the...
- South Carolina Looks to Legalize Home Poker and Charity Gambling South Carolina Senator Glenn McConnell is hoping to legalize...










